[syncmaster]

Well sir I assume you are very hairy!
More so than the general public!
So congrats on your new fusion for as late as it may seem!
How ever I will wait for when the 9 speed tranny comes out and see what hand we are dealt this time.

 

[2010SEL]

.... Honestly i see that Ford cut all kinds of corners with the new fusion but figures people will buy them anyway because they look so good that the little stuff will get missed.

Such as?

 

[2010SEL]

Did all you guys that think the '13/'14 Eco-Boost 2.0 is "slow" have the shifter in "D" or in "S"? It makes a huge difference!

 

[Cobrajet]

Did all you guys that think the '13/'14 Eco-Boost 2.0 is "slow" have the shifter in "D" or in "S"? It makes a huge difference!

That surprises me too, I drove a '12 Sport at the same lot right before I drove the '13 2.0 and the '13 definitely "felt" a lot faster. Plus, as far as looks go, the '13 definitely gets the edge by a long shot IMO. Not putting down the first gens, just my opinion. The main complaint I have about the '13 is that the paddle shifters are not as responsive as they should be, but does very well if you just leave it in sport mode.

 

[Zygote Bros]

Not sure how fair it is to compare a 2015 base 4 cylinder to a 2012 mid level 6 cylinder. Of course the 2012 will have more power. In addition, the 2012 will have fatter tires (doesn't the 2015 S have 205x65x16 low rolling resistance tires?). That will have a big effect on handling.

I had a 2012 Fusion S with manual transmission. Due to a knee injury, I traded in that car for a 2014 Fusion SE with auto and 1.5 Ecoboost.

The front passenger area does seem slightly tighter, but due mostly to the wider console in the middle. But the center armrest is more comfortable. The rear seat looks a little smaller, but I haven't sat back there much. The seats are more comfortable, the fabric has something to do with that as well as the power driver seat controls on the SE. My wife says the seats are more comfortable also. I am disappointed that the trunk and trunk opening is smaller, the hinges take up a lot of space.

In terms of the 1.5 Ecoboost vs. the 2.5, the little Ecoboost has stronger midrange torque. Overall the Ecoboost makes only a few more horses, but the torque curve makes it more pleasant to drive. The transmission is a little sluggish in "D" mode, but feels more lively in "S" mode. I use that if I'm in a hurry around town or need quick downshifts. Fuel economy has been a little disappointing so far, about 5% less than the 2.5 in mostly city driving. I haven't done much highway driving yet, hope to do that soon.

The SE has much fatter tires than the old "S" (235x50x17 vs 205x60x16) so it will handle better (and affect gas mileage). Just before I traded it in, I had 215x60 Bridgestones put on and it helped reduce understeer. I would call the two cars close to even. The new car does handle a little flatter and is a bit quieter.

The turbos have a different torque curve compared to the normally aspirated sixes. More torque at lower rpm should give more oomph off the line once the turbo passes the initial turbo lag. Overall they seem to be similar to an equivalent 2.5 (vs. 1.5 turbo) or 3.5 (vs 2.0 turbo). The 2.5 isn't a bad engine, though. I was on the interstate once and did 80-110 pretty quickly in 6th gear...

 

[gwitt]

That seems to be a good, unbiased, realistic comparison.

 

[Walbogs]

Car and Driver just did an instrumented test of a 2014 2.0 AWD Titanium and compared it to the 2012 SPORT AWD. Simply stated the obvious:

-2014 has a much more refined ride
-2014 has much nicer interior and sweet looks
-2012 is faster to 60 and though the quarter mile
-2014 does not deliver on the fuel economy promises unless driven with a feather foot
-2014 is the better car, but the 2012 is slightly faster

I wasn't surprised by the results.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/ford-fusion-titanium-20l-ecoboost-awd-test-review

 

[krisverde]

I love my 2010 S. But I like the 2nd gens much better. Just IMO.

 

[croppz]

I feel like the 1.5 gens look classier than the 2nd gens. Something about it just looks nicer. But nice and cool are two different things and the front end of the 2nd gens are def cooler haha.

 

[coldconfession13]

I love my sport. I have driven a ecoboost fusion and noticed the lag between shifts or what I read on it "Turbo Lag" . The shifting didn't feel smooth felt rough. Now that was new and hasn't been broken in yet.

 

[LCHRDOG48]

I bought my '10 Sport for 18k early last year. I do like the looks of the newer model but to get the newer one loaded would cost alot more then what I paid for my loaded sport so I'll stick with the older model. I lowered it with steeda springs and put aftermarket wheels and tires and cross-drilled/slotted rotors. The thing handles amazingly. There are a few more things I want to do like the steeda CAI, programmer and TB spacer as well as the magna-flow exhaust and strut tower brace. Even after all of that it will be alot cheaper to own and already looks better then most sports I have seen so Im happy keeping it. Also I havent had a singal mechanical issue out if it.

 

[Pancakes]

One thing that is interesting is the gas mileage comparison. Almost all of the 2013 2.0L on Fuelly are getting between 18-22 avg mpg whereas I am easily getting 22-25 without being conservative in my 3.5 Sport. I even managed 27.1 MPG on a trip from Chicago to Toronto (about 500 miles).

 

[black00betty]

I'm more of the 17-20mpg, I drive very little highway miles but I've also got 27mpg on a longer drive.

I should add that I'm not a very conservative drive either.

 

[2010SEL]

One thing that is interesting is the gas mileage comparison. Almost all of the 2013 2.0L on Fuelly are getting between 18-22 avg mpg whereas I am easily getting 22-25 without being conservative in my 3.5 Sport. I even managed 27.1 MPG on a trip from Chicago to Toronto (about 500 miles).

23.1 mpg avg on my '14 2.0L AWD Ecoboost, over 12,000 miles.

 

[broncocalpoly]

One thing that is interesting is the gas mileage comparison. Almost all of the 2013 2.0L on Fuelly are getting between 18-22 avg mpg whereas I am easily getting 22-25 without being conservative in my 3.5 Sport. I even managed 27.1 MPG on a trip from Chicago to Toronto (about 500 miles).

Gas mileage was lower than expected when I first got my 2013 Fusion 2.0L FWD. At the time, I was getting 22 mpg. After 20,000 miles on the odometer, I am getting 25.1 mpg. That's with 85% highway driving at an average of 80mph and 15% city. I bought it with every single option available on the 2013 model and I just love how it looks, handles and it's overall solid feel. I can honestly say that, if given the chance, I wouldn't buy any other car...I would buy the new Fusion again, fully loaded of course.

 

[streetrodderken]

As many of you know I currently have two Fusions. A 2015 Fusion S and a 2012 Fusion SEL V6

I’ve put about 1k miles on the 2015 so far.. and in the 1.5 years of ownership of the 2012 I’ve racked about 7k miles (5k of that has been road trips).

Power: Well with the 2.5 and 3.0 there is no comparison. The 2.5 is gutless. It was chosen for its MPG and cost. Now the 3.0 in my V6 is a blast in comparison. Is it a true powerhouse? No.. but when you’re talking midsize sedans it’s comparable. Needless to say I almost got a 2.5 SEL fusion in 2012. I’m glad I didn’t. The V6 option has a nice tone to it, sounds throaty, and there is enough power there to pass and let the vehicle have some fun in corners.

Handling: The 2012 handles very well stock for its size. I can tell the car where to go and it will go with very little slip. Body roll is there there but I don’t consider it to be too bad. It can be improved upon. But lets put it this way.. my 2001 Durango with all new suspension and being an SUV can take corners better than my Fusion. The 2015 sucks. No real confidence in the handling of the vehicle. I assume cheap tires are at fault but.. with the lack of power to push it, it’s hard to say just how much one can push it. But on that daily driving route it doesn’t handle too well in comparison to my 12 model. The 15 also tends to wobble in the groves of the highway where as my 12 does not do this. Maybe the width of the 12 is just a tad bit wider to sit in the groves or over them. Who knows.

Interior: The 12 to me feels much roomier. I’m 6’4 @ 180lbs so I’m not big but tall. Of the few road trips I’ve taken I feel comfortable. Could it be bigger? Sure. But I could go a solid 5 hours of sitting without feeling the need to get out and stretch at the next fill up. The seats seem to be of better height and function and the steering wheel seems to fit quite well. For the 15 model it feels a bit cramped. Hard to be comfortable for long periods of time and kinda awkward to “lean” to the side. The center console is a bit more curved and noticeable. This is a no no with my right knee cap. I’ll have a rub spot on the dash soon enough.

In terms of overall: The 2015 is quite nice. It’s built well. Nice features. I love the layout of the stereo. Backup camera is a huge plus. Gauges are nice. Trunk is huge! Outside of comfort, power and handling it’s a really nice car to keep up with the times.

Hi I REALLY CANT understand, WHY these companies models such as Fusion, Chev. Malibu, and lmpala DONT offer a 2 door SPORTS model ?????? With high out put V-6 ETC. ????!!