I did a brief comparo of a rental 300C with the 3.5L V6 a few months back so I thought I'd do one for a Chevy Impala LT I had the last couple of days. I tried to price it out at Chevy's website and think I got pretty close at $25k. It was silver, black leather, XM, spoiler, 17's, heated seats and the 3.9L V6 with active fuel management (can run on 3 cyl). According to Chevy, the 3.9L is good for 233 hp and 240 lb ft.
First, what I liked about the Impala. The leather felt like a much higher quality than my Fusion SEL. The grain was smoother and softer, on the seats and steering wheel. Also, the center armrest was stitched leather, not that plastic crap in the Fusion. The instrumentaion was cleaner and looked more modern. The XM was great (I know- Sirius is avail now on the Fusion), and the Impala was roomier than the Fusion. I expect a fairer comparison would be the Ford 500 from a roominess standpoint. Also the trunk and back seat area was huge. And of course the engine- 240 lb ft (39?? more than Fusion) is hard to hide. You just touch the gas and you feel it instantly. I don't know how their 0-60 times compare- but th Impala had that "torque on demand" feel to it. Lastly, the active fuel mgmt is a great feature, and it actually shows when you are in 3 vs 6 cyl mode on the info display- along with your mpg.
Now for the dislikes. It's not as attractive as the Fusion. Ok its boring compared to the Fusion. The interior has some cheap plastics (the dash sounds hollow), and the door panels are hard (but the seams narrower). The transmission is really disappointing- only a 4 speed. I imagine a 6 spd would really let the engine run. The steering was also way overboosted- which wasn't too bad in a parking lot, but a little nervious on less that smooth roads. Having the XM was great, but the speaker quality and power was below par. Lastly, it had a lot more roll and understeer in the corners- very noticeable on off-ramps where I had to correct several times to keep a steady line.
Dollar for dollar I would say the Fusion wins by a hair. There is no comparison with the engines- that extra .9L makes a big difference for the Impala. But luckily the Fusion has the 6 spd tranny to help compensate for the lack of power. If all I did was travel interstate, I would choose the Impala for the room and comfort, but for all around I'll stick with my Fusion.
First, what I liked about the Impala. The leather felt like a much higher quality than my Fusion SEL. The grain was smoother and softer, on the seats and steering wheel. Also, the center armrest was stitched leather, not that plastic crap in the Fusion. The instrumentaion was cleaner and looked more modern. The XM was great (I know- Sirius is avail now on the Fusion), and the Impala was roomier than the Fusion. I expect a fairer comparison would be the Ford 500 from a roominess standpoint. Also the trunk and back seat area was huge. And of course the engine- 240 lb ft (39?? more than Fusion) is hard to hide. You just touch the gas and you feel it instantly. I don't know how their 0-60 times compare- but th Impala had that "torque on demand" feel to it. Lastly, the active fuel mgmt is a great feature, and it actually shows when you are in 3 vs 6 cyl mode on the info display- along with your mpg.
Now for the dislikes. It's not as attractive as the Fusion. Ok its boring compared to the Fusion. The interior has some cheap plastics (the dash sounds hollow), and the door panels are hard (but the seams narrower). The transmission is really disappointing- only a 4 speed. I imagine a 6 spd would really let the engine run. The steering was also way overboosted- which wasn't too bad in a parking lot, but a little nervious on less that smooth roads. Having the XM was great, but the speaker quality and power was below par. Lastly, it had a lot more roll and understeer in the corners- very noticeable on off-ramps where I had to correct several times to keep a steady line.
Dollar for dollar I would say the Fusion wins by a hair. There is no comparison with the engines- that extra .9L makes a big difference for the Impala. But luckily the Fusion has the 6 spd tranny to help compensate for the lack of power. If all I did was travel interstate, I would choose the Impala for the room and comfort, but for all around I'll stick with my Fusion.